Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Death of PhilosophyReference and Self-reference in Contemporary Thought$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Isabelle Thomas-Fogiel

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780231147781

Published to Columbia Scholarship Online: November 2015

DOI: 10.7312/columbia/9780231147781.001.0001

Show Summary Details

Helmholtz’s Choice as a Choice for Reference

Helmholtz’s Choice as a Choice for Reference

The Naturalization of Critique

Chapter:
(p.217) 11 Helmholtz’s Choice as a Choice for Reference
Source:
The Death of Philosophy
Author(s):

Isabelle Thomas-Fogiel

, Richard A. Lynch
Publisher:
Columbia University Press
DOI:10.7312/columbia/9780231147781.003.0011

This chapter examines Hermann von Helmholtz’s positivist reading of Immanuel Kant that tended to “naturalize” the critical project—a resolute naturalism that reflected his scientific training. Helmholtz’s fundamental approach consists in applying strictly mechanistic and quantitative models to all phenomena, including biological phenomena. In doing so, he disagreed with his era’s physiologists’ vitalism. In his eyes, a Newtonian mechanism could account for the totality of natural phenomena. What is of interest here is the way that he thought Kant could justify this entirely Newtonian conception of science. His decisive reinterpretation of Kantian concepts is always carried out along the same axis: a concealment of the reflexive dimension and a naturalization of Kantianism. This chapter first considers Helmholtz’s views on knowledge in comparison to those of Kant before discussing his psychophysiological interpretation of the a priori, along with the physiological future of the distinction between things in themselves and phenomena. It concludes that Helmholtz quite well embodies a positivist reading of critique, which he specifies as a naturalization of critique (psychophysiology).

Keywords:   positivism, Hermann von Helmholtz, Immanuel Kant, naturalism, natural phenomena, science, naturalization, Kantianism, knowledge, a priori

Columbia Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .