Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Scandal of ReasonA Critical Theory of Political Judgment$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Albena Azmanova

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780231153805

Published to Columbia Scholarship Online: November 2015

DOI: 10.7312/columbia/9780231153805.001.0001

Show Summary Details

Judgment Unbound

Judgment Unbound

Arendt

Chapter:
(p.118) Chapter 5 Judgment Unbound
Source:
The Scandal of Reason
Author(s):

Albena Azmanova

Publisher:
Columbia University Press
DOI:10.7312/columbia/9780231153805.003.0006

In the 1960s, Hannah Arendt endeavored to advance a concept of judgment explicitly set against Kantian moral universalism. This chapter follows this trajectory of conceptualization in order to discern those elements that can advance us toward a theory of critical judgment. It first examines the notion of critique of power that emerges in Arendt's writing on judgment. It then assesses the capacity of her model of judgment to account for normative criticism. It argues that Arendt's notion of reflective judgment allows us to acknowledge fully the normative power of the hermeneutic dimension of shared meanings and to advance a notion of an unconstrained, open process of judging. However, it also identifies features that impede the critical capacity of her account of judgment.

Keywords:   Hannah Arendt, political philosophy, political judgment, Kantian moral universalism, critical judgment, normative criticism

Columbia Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .