Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Scandal of ReasonA Critical Theory of Political Judgment$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Albena Azmanova

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780231153805

Published to Columbia Scholarship Online: November 2015

DOI: 10.7312/columbia/9780231153805.001.0001

Show Summary Details

Conclusion

Conclusion

Letting Go of Ideal Theory

Chapter:
(p.227) Conclusion
Source:
The Scandal of Reason
Author(s):

Albena Azmanova

Publisher:
Columbia University Press
DOI:10.7312/columbia/9780231153805.003.0011

This concluding chapter summarizes the development of a critical theory of judgment discussed in the preceding chapters. The proposed theory of deliberative judgment relies on an account of the critical capacity of public deliberations rather than on a normative model of deliberative democracy. The point of entry into this journey has been a proposal to approach justice from the perspective of the emancipatory rather than the conciliatory concerns of Critical Theory. These are concerns with alleviating structurally rooted injustice rather than with establishing consensus on universal norms of justice. Thus, grievances of injustice, and not appeals to justice, provide both the validity perspective and the context-transcending perspective of a critical theory of judgment.

Keywords:   political judgment, political philosophy, critical theory, normative theory, deliberative judgment, public deliberation, normative model, deliberative democracy

Columbia Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .