Are Aesthetic Models the Best Way to Talk About the Artfulness of Literary Texts?
This afterword takes a skeptical and even contentious approach some of the other contributions in this volume rather than politely reviewing and synthesizing them as afterwords more often do. It suggests that essays in the preceding chapters by and large deal with materials for which “the aesthetic is not in fact central,” mostly because works whose fundamental medium is language are not what aesthetic philosophy was created to understand. It insists that the essays may attend to specific aesthetic properties of particular works of art, but, always with an eye to the social or political utility of those properties; they “build predicates for social use into the very definition of ‘aesthetic’ from the start”.
Columbia Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .