Downside Potential Under Risk
Downside Potential Under Risk
The Allais Paradox and Its Conflicting Interpretations
This chapter focuses on the psychological importance of downside risk by presenting Maurice Allais's paradox and by contrasting how Allais and prospect theory have interpreted this paradox. It also considers whether the HRL formulation can be used to model how financial market participants form “expectations” of the dispersion of returns under uncertainty. The chapter begins with a brief overview of expected utility theory, with particular emphasis on the Saint Petersburg paradox and how it was resolved by Daniel Bernoulli in 1738. It then considers the Allais paradox and its conflicting interpretations, including prospect theory. It also offers a critique of prospect theory and goes on to discuss Allais's interpretation of his paradox, paying special attention to his invariant cardinal utility function. The chapter concludes with an assessment of the utility of a risky prospect.
Keywords: downside risk, Maurice Allais, prospect theory, HRL formulation, expectations, expected utility theory, Saint Petersburg paradox, Daniel Bernoulli, Allais paradox, cardinal utility function
Columbia Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .