Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Mental Health in the War on TerrorCulture, Science, and Statecraft$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Neil Aggarwal

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780231166645

Published to Columbia Scholarship Online: November 2015

DOI: 10.7312/columbia/9780231166645.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM COLUMBIA SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.columbia.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Minnesota Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CUPSO for personal use.date: 01 April 2020

Bioethics and the Conduct of Mental Health Professionals in the War on Terror

Bioethics and the Conduct of Mental Health Professionals in the War on Terror

Chapter:
(p.30) 2 Bioethics and the Conduct of Mental Health Professionals in the War on Terror
Source:
Mental Health in the War on Terror
Author(s):

Neil Krishan Aggarwal

Publisher:
Columbia University Press
DOI:10.7312/columbia/9780231166645.003.0002

This chapter raises issues concerning the alleged involvement of military medical professionals in the unjust interrogation of the Department of Defense to the psychologically distressed suspects of terrorism. In 2004, news stories on detainee abuse at the Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo Bay detention facilities aggravated allegations that military medical professionals have been sharing the medical information of war-traumatized patients to the military officers for interrogation. These accusations raise alarms that the detainees' mental and physical ailments might be exploited by interrogators to extract information in an inhumane way. Bioethicists condemned these actions, calling for “the non-military medical community to unite in support of their military colleagues, and condemn torture and inhumane and degrading practices against detainees.” Foremost among their principles in fighting detainee abuse are respect for autonomy (respect for the decision of the autonomous person), nonmaleficence (avoidance of harm), beneficence (providing benefits), and justice (distributing benefits, risks, and costs fairly).

Keywords:   Department of Defense, medical professionals, terrorism, Bioethicists, respect for autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, justice

Columbia Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .