Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Death Penalty In ChinaPolicy, Practice, and Reform$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Bin Liang and Hong Lu

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780231170079

Published to Columbia Scholarship Online: May 2016

DOI: 10.7312/columbia/9780231170079.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM COLUMBIA SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.columbia.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Minnesota Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CUPSO for personal use.date: 29 March 2020

Between Deference and Defiance

Between Deference and Defiance

Courts and Penal Populism in Chinese Capital Cases

Chapter:
(p.274) 10 Between Deference and Defiance
Source:
The Death Penalty In China
Author(s):

Hualing Fu

Publisher:
Columbia University Press
DOI:10.7312/columbia/9780231170079.003.0010

This chapter examines the relationship between media, public opinion and death penalty judicial decisions in China. As argued, unlike the experiences of Western democracies, China’s penal populism as exhibited in death penalty cases often targets judicial decision-making in individual cases rather than legislative changes.

Keywords:   media and public opinion impact, penal populism, comparison to Western experience, influence over judicial decision-making, judicial responding, cash for clemency

Columbia Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .