Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Beating HeartsAbortion and Animal Rights$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Sherry F. Colb and Michael C. Dorf

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780231175142

Published to Columbia Scholarship Online: September 2016

DOI: 10.7312/columbia/9780231175142.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM COLUMBIA SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.columbia.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Minnesota Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CUPSO for personal use.date: 20 September 2021



(p.120) 5 Strategy
Beating Hearts

Sherry F. Colb

Michael C. Dorf

Columbia University Press

Reforms that fall significantly short of a movement’s ultimate aims may move society closer to those aims but they may instead prove counter-productive, because they may signal to the public that, as reformed but not eradicated, the challenged practices are acceptable. We lack sufficient empirical information to reach a definitive conclusion about which is more likely with respect to abortion and animal rights, but there are reasons to think that meliorism is likely to be more effective for the pro-life movement than for the animal rights movement.

Keywords:   Gradualism, Welfare, Welfarism, Abolition, Reform, Revolution

Columbia Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .