Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Chimeras of FormModernist Internationalism Beyond Europe, 1914-2016$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Aarthi Vadde

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780231180245

Published to Columbia Scholarship Online: September 2017

DOI: 10.7312/columbia/9780231180245.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM COLUMBIA SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.columbia.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Minnesota Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CUPSO for personal use.date: 20 June 2021

Archival Legends

Archival Legends

National Myth and Transnational Memory in the Works of Michael Ondaatje

(p.149) 4 Archival Legends
Chimeras of Form

Aarthi Vadde

Columbia University Press

The chimera of form featured in my fourth chapter is the archival legend, which I use to classify Billy the Kid and Sailor from Ondaatje’s The Collected Works of Billy the Kid (1970; extended reissue, 2008) and Anil’s Ghost (2000) respectively. Combining theories of the archive as a space of material collection and artifactual remains and theories of the legend as a genre of storytelling that cultivates the unreal and the unknowable, I argue that Ondaatje uses archival legends to broach the tensions between isolationism and internationalism, cultural particularity and the universal norms of justice associated with human rights. While some critics have argued that Ondaatje’s collage aesthetics are irresponsible and compound injustice because they obscure the cause and effect of historicist narratives (a criticism that will recall for many Georg Lukács’ famous disregard for modernism), this chapter shows that Ondaatje’s work subjects the norms of both international justice and historicist causality to criticism for being inadequately sensitive to cultural memory. Rejecting both the disembodying abstractions of human rights dicta and the embodying practices of historical identification, he uses archival legends as figure of semi-embodiment brought into being by formal strategies of artifact collection, fragment accretion, and loose assembly. These legends situate universal norms and historical facts within the foggier, but actually-existing realms of national myth and transnational memory. Without attending to these dominant and emergent domains of cultural memory, Ondaatje suggests that internationalism forsakes the domain of sentiment and risks becoming tone deaf to the cosmological gaps that persist in how members of “strong” versus “weak” nations view colonialism’s impact on the global present.

Keywords:   Michael Ondaatje, world literature, archive, transnational memory, national myth, cosmopolitanism

Columbia Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .